OKUN v. TANNERS


11 N.Y.3d 762 (2008)

STANLEY OKUN, Respondent, v. PAUL TANNERS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided September 11, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosenberg Feldman Smith, LLP, New York City (Michael H. Smith and Richard B. Feldman of counsel), for appellant.

Shaw, Licitra, Gulotta, Esernio & Henry, P.C., Garden City (Thomas M. Hoey, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur in memorandum.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, plaintiff's cross motion to restore the action to the calendar denied and defendant's motion to dismiss the action as abandoned dismissed as unnecessary. The certified question should be answered in the negative.

Under the circumstances, plaintiff's conclusory and unsubstantiated claim of law office failure does not constitute a reasonable excuse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases