Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly validated those signatures which were witnessed by the respondent Ronald Friedman, a notary public, who obtained a statement from each of the signatories affirming the truth of the matter to which they subscribed their names and thereby substantially complied with Election Law § 6-132(3) (see Matter of Brown v Suffolk County Bd. of Elections,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.