1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 54 A.D.3d
  5. 54 A.D.3d 307 (2008)
 

COHEN v. KALMAN

54 A.D.3d 307 (2008)

863 N.Y.S.2d 63

RHODA COHEN, Respondent, v. DORON KALMAN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

August 5, 2008.

The plaintiff in a dental malpractice action must establish that the defendant departed from good and accepted dental practice and that such departure was a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries (see Terranova v Finklea, 45 A.D.3d 572 [2007]; Calabro v Hescheles, 22 A.D.3d 622 [2005]). The defendant, an oral and maxillofacial surgeon, made a prima facie showing of his entitlement to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases