ZITO v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK

22003/2006.

2008 NY Slip Op 51655 (U)

JOSEPH ZITO, individually and as successor in interest to MARY ZITO, NANCY ZITO, CATHERINE COMMISSO, VINCENT ZITO and FRANK ZITO, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Defendant.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Suffolk County.

Decided May 23, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Attorney for Plaintiff: Kressel Rothlein Walsh & Roth, LLC, Massapequa, NY.

Attorney for Defendants: Christopher M. Gatto, Esq., Christine Malafi, Esq., Hauppauge, NY.


WILLIAM B. REBOLINI, J.

This is an action brought against the County of Suffolk (hereinafter the County) for breach of an agreement and unjust enrichment. The County now brings this motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 basically upon the grounds of Statute of Frauds and Statute of Limitations.

According to the plaintiff, sometime around 1992 and 1993 the County was undertaking a project to expand a road and was seeking to acquire certain property through...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases