PEOPLE v. BARNES

2005-05070.

2008 NY Slip Op 06458

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. WILMER BARNES, appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided July 29, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Sharon Y. Brodt, and John F. McGoldrick of counsel), for respondent.

Murray E. Singer, Great Neck, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., ROBERT A. LIFSON, JOSEPH COVELLO, RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ.


DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the hearing court improperly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony on the ground that it was tainted by a suggestive photographic identification procedure. The hearing court's conclusion that the witness's prior familiarity with the defendant was such that he was impervious to police suggestion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases