IN THE MATTER OF SHOCKOME v. SHOCKOME

2007-01342.

2008 NY Slip Op 06377

IN THE MATTER OF TIMOTHY SHOCKOME, respondent, v. YEVGENIA SHOCKOME, appellant. (Docket Nos. V-05156-02, V-05157-02)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided July 22, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neal D. Futerfas, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Arza R. Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y. (Steven A. Feldman of counsel), for respondent.

Frank Marocco, Carmel, N.Y., attorney for the children.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., STEVEN W. FISHER, ROBERT A. LIFSON, MARK C. DILLON, JJ.


DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In adjudicating visitation, the most important factor is the best interests of the children (see Matter of Wilson v. McGlinchey, 2 N.Y.3d 375). A visitation order may be modified upon a showing of sufficient change in circumstances since the entry of the prior order such that modification is warranted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases