Defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle while talking on a cell phone (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c). Following a nonjury trial, the court determined that the offense was committed within a few minutes of the time alleged in the accusatory instrument, and when, by defendant's own admission, she used her cell phone. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SHAO
2007-1377 D CR.
2008 NY Slip Op 51467 (U)
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MEIJUAN SHAO, Appellant.
Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 16, 2008.
Decided July 16, 2008.
Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
