FATIMA v. TWENTY SEVEN-TWENTY FOUR REALTY CORP.

2007-09584.

2008 NY Slip Op 06284

HAMIDA FATIMA, ETC., ET AL., appellants, v. TWENTY SEVEN-TWENTY FOUR REALTY CORP., respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided July 15, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rimland & Associates, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Anthony M. Grisanti of counsel), for appellants.

Shayne, Dachs, Corker, Sauer & Dachs, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Jonathan A. Dachs of counsel), for respondent.

Before: STEVEN W. FISHER, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, THOMAS A. DICKERSON, ARIEL E. BELEN, JJ.


DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

While the defendant's failure to keep a current address on file with the Secretary of State did not constitute a reasonable excuse to vacate its default under CPLR 5015(a)(1) (see Franklin v. 172 Aububon Corp., 32 A.D.3d 454; Santiago v. Sansue Realty Corp., 243 A.D.2d 622, 623; Conte Cadillac v. C...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases