1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 340 P.3d
  5. 340 P.3d 563 (2014)
 

IN RE CAY CLUBS

Nos. 58176, 59751.

340 P.3d 563 (2014)

In re CAY CLUBS. David B. Clark; Ann Clark; Donald W. Gillis; Nell C. Gillis; Peter Gillis; Mary Piscitelli; Thomas Tedesco; Kenneth B. Ritchey; Debra A. Ritchey; Michael Gianforte; Kyle Smith; Nancy Helgeson; Raymond D. Reed, II; Bryan Sopko; Christopher T. Wilson; Jay Jadeja; Ketan Patel; Rajesh Patel; Paresh Shukla; Rosanno Delara; Randall J. Goyette; Rita M. Goyette; John Thompson; Michael Zari; Michael Crouch; Alex Arriaga; Marius Smook; James McNeil; Suzan McNeil-Tusson; Lolita Alvarez; and Dolores Ceralvo, Appellants, v. JDI Loans, LLC; JDI Realty, LLC; and Jeffrey Aeder, Respondents. In the Matter of Cay Clubs. David B. Clark; Ann Clark; Donald W. Gillis; Nell C. Gillis; Peter Gillis; Mary Piscitelli; Thomas Tedesco; Kenneth B. Ritchey; Debra A. Ritchey; Michael Gianforte; Kyle Smith; Nancy Helgeson; Raymond D. Reed, II; Bryan Sopko; Christopher T. Wilson; Jay Jadeja; Ketan Patel; Rajesh Patel; Paresh Shukla; Rosanno Delara; Randall J. Goyette; Rita M. Goyette; John Thompson; Michael Zari; Michael Crouch; Alex Arriaga; Marius Smook; James McNeil; Suzan McNeil-Tusson; Lolita Alvarez; and Dolores Ceralvo, Appellants, v. JDI Realty, LLC; JDI Loans, LLC; and Jeffrey Aeder, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

December 4, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg and Alice Campos Mercado and Robert L. Eisenberg , Reno; Gerard & Associates and Robert B. Gerard and Ricardo R. Ehmann , Las Vegas, for Appellants.

Lionel Sawyer & Collins and Charles H. McCrea, Jr. , and Lynda Sue Mabry , Las Vegas, for Respondents.

Morris Law Group and Steve L. Morris , Las Vegas, for Amici Curiae.

Before the Court En Banc.

OPINION

On March 6, 2014, a panel of this court issued an opinion examining the partnership-by-estoppel doctrine and affirming in part, reversing in part, and remanding a district court order that determined on summary judgment that the doctrine did not apply. Because this case involves a substantial precedential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases