ELIZONDO v. HOOD MACHINE, INC.

No. 61229.

312 P.3d 479 (2013)

Carlos R. ELIZONDO, Appellant, v. HOOD MACHINE, INC.; and Employers Insurance Company of Nevada, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

November 7, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Evan B. Beavers , Nevada Attorney for Injured Workers, and Mary Bartell , Deputy Attorney for Injured Workers, Carson City, for Appellant.

Beckett, Yott, McCarty & Spann, Chtd., and James A. McCarty , Reno, for Respondents.

BEFORE HARDESTY, PARRAGUIRRE and CHERRY, JJ.


OPINION

By the Court, HARDESTY, J.:

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the appeals officer's conclusory order in a workers' compensation matter failed to meet the statutory requirements of NRS 233B.125, and whether the doctrines of claim and issue preclusion apply to require dismissal of Carlos Elizondo's fourth request to reopen an industrial injury claim under NRS 616C.390. We conclude that the appeals officer's order was procedurally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases