KHAN v. BAKHSH

No. 60262.

306 P.3d 411 (2013)

Muhammad Q. KHAN, an Individual; and Maimoona Q. Khan, an Individual, Appellants, v. Qadir BAKHSH, an Individual, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

August 1, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael H. Singer, Ltd., and Michael H. Singer , Las Vegas, for Appellants.

Agwara & Associates and Liborius I. Agwara and George A. Maglares , Las Vegas, for Respondent.

Before HARDESTY, PARRAGUIRRE and CHERRY, JJ.


OPINION

By the Court, CHERRY, J.:

At the bench trial in this case, Muhammad Q. and Maimoona Q. Khan presented evidence of an allegedly written, but lost or destroyed, agreement between the Khans and Qadir Bakhsh to purchase a certain restaurant and land from Bakhsh. The district court excluded this evidence under the statute of frauds because the Khans failed to produce the written agreement. The question in dispute is whether the district court erred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases