MONK v. KENNEDY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC.

Docket No. A-0737-22.

SHENISE MONK and JORDI WILSON, on behalf of their minor son, J.W., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KENNEDY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., KENNEDY UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS MATERNAL FETAL MEDICINE, STEPHAN HOSMER, D.O., SUSAN JANECZEK, D.O., KEITH WILLIAMS, M.D., SOPHIA VOGIATZIDAKIS, D.O., TOMAS ROTSCHILD, M.D., and LLOYD TINIANOW, M.D., Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 3, 2024.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Becker argued the cause for appellants Shenise Monk and Jordi Wilson (Kline & Specter, attorneys; Charles L. Becker , Elizabeth A. Crawford , Ruxandra Maniu Laidacker , and Michelle Anne Paznokas , on the briefs).

Andrew S. Winegar argued the cause for respondents Kennedy University Hospital, Inc., and Kennedy University Hospitals Maternal Fetal Medicine (Parker McCay, PA, attorneys; Thomas M. Walsh and Andrew S. Winegar , on the brief).

Michael Christopher Pacholski argued the cause for respondent Stephan Hosmer, D.O. (Stahl & DeLaurentis, PC, attorneys; Michael Christopher Pacholski , on the brief).

Paul Earl Peel (O'Brien & Ryan, LLP) argued the cause for respondents Susan Janeczek, D.O., Keith Williams, M.D., and Sophia Vogiatzidakis, D.O. ( Paul Earl Peel , Anthony P. DeMichele (O'Brien & Ryan, LLP), and Jaime Nicole Johnson (O'Brien & Ryan, LLP), attorneys; Anthony P. DeMichele , Nicole Johnson , and Paul Earl Peel , on the brief).

Walter F. Kawalec, III , and John B. Mullahy argued the cause for respondents Tomas Rotschild, M.D., and Lloyd Tinianow, M.D. (Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, and Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, attorneys; Walter F. Kawalec, III , and John B. Mullahy , on the brief).

Before Judges Berdote Byrne and Bishop-Thompson.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases