STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
James COMER, a/k/a James B. Comer and James F. Comer, Defendant-Appellant.
State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
James C. Zarate, a/k/a Navajas Zarate, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Frank J. Ducoat , Special Deputy Attorney General/Acting Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent in State v. Comer (A-42-20) ( Theodore N. Stephens, II , Acting Essex County Prosecutor, attorney; Frank J. Ducoat , of counsel and on the briefs).
Alyssa Aiello , Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant in State v. Zarate (A-43-20) ( Joseph E. Krakora , Public Defender, attorney; Alyssa Aiello , of counsel and on the briefs).
Joseph J. Russo , Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for amicus curiae Public Defender of New Jersey in State v. Comer (A-42-20) ( Joseph E. Krakora , Public Defender, attorney; Alicia J. Hubbard , of counsel and on the brief).
Dillon J. McGuire , Hackensack, argued the cause for amicus curiae Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey in State v. Comer (A-42-20) (Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, attorneys; CJ Griffin , of counsel and on the brief, and Dillon J. McGuire , on the brief).
Natalie J. Kraner argued the cause for amici curiae Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth, Incarcerated Children's Advocacy Network, New Jersey Parents' Caucus, Transformative Justice Initiative, The Beyond the Blindfold of Justice Project, Formerly Incarcerated Youth, and New Jersey Incarcerated Youth in State v. Comer (A-42-20), and State v. Zarate (A-43-20) ( Lowenstein Sandler , and The Rutgers Criminal and Youth Justice Clinic, attorneys; Natalie J. Kraner , Anthony J. Cocuzza , Stephanie Ashley , Laura Cohen , Elana Wilf , and Tyler Dougherty , on the brief).
Rachel E. Simon argued the cause for amicus curiae Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey in State v. Zarate (A-43-20) (Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, attorneys; Aidan P. O'Connor , of counsel and on the brief, and Darcy Baboulis-Gyscek , on the brief).
CHIEF JUSTICERABNER delivered the opinion of the Court.
This appeal raises challenging questions about the constitutional limits that apply to sentences for juvenile offenders.
The law recognizes what we all know from life experience — that children are different from adults. Children lack...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.