MEADE v. TP. OF LIVINGSTON

A-52 September Term 2020 085176.

265 A.3d 148 (2021)

249 N.J. 310

Michele MEADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 30, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher P. Lenzo argued the cause for appellant (Lenzo & Reis, attorneys; Christopher P. Lenzo, Morristown, of counsel and on the briefs).

Juan C. Fernandez argued the cause for respondent ( Fernandez Garcia , attorneys; Juan C. Fernandez, of counsel and on the briefs, and Michael Garcia , Cedar Grove, on the briefs).

Richard M. Schall argued the cause for amicus curiae National Employment Lawyers Association of New Jersey (Schall & Barasch, attorneys; Richard M. Schall, Moorestown, on the brief).


In this appeal, the Court considers whether discriminatory conduct toward an employee by that employee's subordinate can result in liability on the part of the employer under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to-50. Specifically, the issue is whether an employee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases