HAGER v. M&K CONST.

A-64 September Term 2019. 084045.

247 A.3d 864 (2021)

246 N.J. 1

Vincent HAGER, Petitioner-Respondent, v. M&K CONSTRUCTION, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 13, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Gitterman , argued the cause for appellant (Biancamano & DiStefano, attorneys; James E. Santomauro , on the brief).

Victor B. Matthews , argued the cause for respondent ( Victor B. Matthews , Denville, on the brief).

Alan Silber , argued the cause for amici curiae National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, Garden State-NORML, Coalition for Medical Marijuana-NJ and Doctors for Cannabis Regulation (Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, attorneys; Alan Silber, of counsel and on the brief, and Dillon J. McGuire , Hackensack, on the brief).

Elizabeth R. Leong , submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae of American Property Casualty Insurance Association, (Robinson & Cole, attorneys; Elizabeth R. Leong, on the brief).


Vincent Hager injured his back in a work-related accident in 2001 while employed by M&K Construction (M&K). For years thereafter, Hager received treatment for chronic pain with opioid medication and surgical procedures to no avail. In 2016, he enrolled in New Jersey's medical marijuana...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases