GOLDFARB v. SOLIMINE

A-24 September Term 2019 083256.

245 A.3d 570 (2021)

245 N.J. 326

Jed GOLDFARB, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David SOLIMINE, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 18, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christine A. Amalfe , argued the cause for appellant (Gibbons, attorneys; Christine A. Amalfe , of counsel and on the briefs, and Richard S. Zackin and Christopher Walsh , Newark, on the briefs).

Andrew M. Moskowitz argued the cause for respondent (Javerbaum Wurgaft Hicks Kahn Wikstrom & Sinins, attorneys; Andrew M. Moskowitz , Springfield, of counsel and on the briefs).

Jon W. Green argued the cause for amicus curiae National Employment Lawyers Association of New Jersey (Green Savits, attorneys; Jon W. Green , Morristown, of counsel and on the brief).


Plaintiff Jed Goldfarb claims that defendant David Solimine reneged on a promise of employment after Goldfarb quit his job to accept the promised position. Although an employment agreement and its terms were never reduced to writing, plaintiff asserts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases