DOE v. RUTGERS STATE UNIVERSITY

Docket No. A-5285-18T2.

245 A.3d 261 (2021)

466 N.J. Super. 14

Chris DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RUTGERS, the STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY, and Casey Woods in his Official Capacity as the OPRA Administrator and Records Custodian of Rutgers University, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 12, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jamie Epstein , Collingswood, argued the cause for appellant.

Michael O'B. Boldt , Morristown, argued the cause for respondents (McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, attorneys; Michael O'B. Boldt , of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges Alvarez, Sumners and Geiger.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

Defendant Rutgers University, through its records custodian defendant Casey Woods, denied plaintiff Chris Doe's requests under the Open Public Records Act (OPRA), N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 to -13, for various records, including his own Rutgers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases