STATE v. G.E.P.

A-4 September Term 2019 082732.

235 A.3d 157 (2020)

243 N.J. 362

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G.E.P., Defendant-Respondent. State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.P., Defendant-Respondent. State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.P., Defendant-Respondent. State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.K., Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided August 5, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lila B. Leonard , Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant ( Gurbir S. Grewal , Attorney General, attorney; Lila B. Leonard, of counsel and on the briefs).

John McNamara, Jr. , Chief Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant ( Fredric M. Knapp , Morris County Prosecutor, attorney; John McNamara, Jr., of counsel and on the briefs).

Ian C. Kennedy , Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant ( Mark Musella , Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney; Ian C. Kennedy, and William P. Miller , Special Deputy Attorney General/Acting Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the briefs, and Catherine A. Foddai , Legal Assistant, on the briefs).

Lawrence S. Lustberg argued the cause for respondent G.E.P. (Gibbons, attorneys; Lawrence S. Lustberg and Daniel B. Weinstein , and Anne M. Collart , Newark, on the briefs).

Rochelle M. Watson , Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent R.P. ( Joseph E. Krakora , Public Defender, attorney; Rochelle M. Watson, of counsel and on the briefs).

Kelly Anderson Smith argued the cause for respondent C.P. (Kelly Anderson Smith, of counsel and on the briefs).

Stefan Van Jura , Assistant Deputy Public Defender argued the cause for respondent C.K. ( Joseph E. Krakora , Public Defender, attorney; Stefan Van Jura, of counsel and on the briefs).

Tess Borden argued the cause for amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey Foundation, attorneys; Tess Borden, Alexander Shalom , and Jeanne LoCicero , on the brief).


In State v. J.Q., this Court held that expert testimony about Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAAS) could be admitted "to describe traits found in victims of such abuse to aid jurors in evaluating specific defenses." 130 N.J. 554

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases