1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 225 A.3d
  5. 225 A.3d 559 (2020)
 

PATHRI v. KAKARLAMATH

DOCKET No. A-4657-18T1.

225 A.3d 559 (2020)

462 N.J. Super. 208

Phaninder PATHRI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Srivani KAKARLAMATH, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 23, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory A. Pasler argued the cause for appellant (Townsend Tomaio & Newmark, LLC, attorneys; Gregory A. Pasler, on the briefs).

Adam Wiseberg argued the cause for respondent (Ziegler, Zemsky & Resnick, attorneys; Adam Wiseberg, on the brief).

Before Judges Fisher, Gilson and Rose.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

In most respects, the bench and the bar might — with apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan — proclaim the court rules to be "the very model of a modern" set of civil guidelines.1 But, in one respect, the rules haven't quite caught up to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases