1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 225 A.3d
  5. 225 A.3d 137 (2020)
 

HAGER v. M & K CONST.

DOCKET No. A-0102-18T3.

225 A.3d 137 (2020)

462 N.J. Super. 146

Vincent HAGER, Petitioner-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. M & K CONSTRUCTION, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 13, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Gitterman argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Biacamano & DiStefano, attorneys; James E. Santomauro , on the briefs).

Victor B. Matthews , Denville, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant.

Before Judges Yannotti, Currier and Firko.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

In this case of first impression, we consider whether a workers' compensation judge can order an employer to reimburse its employee for the employee's use of medical marijuana prescribed for chronic pain following a work-related accident. Respondent M & K Construction argues that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases