1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 216 A.3d
  5. 216 A.3d 206 (2019)
 

CENTRAL 25 v. ZONING BOARD

DOCKET No. A-0263-17T1.

216 A.3d 206 (2019)

460 N.J. Super. 446

CENTRAL 25, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZONING BOARD OF the CITY OF UNION CITY, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 24, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald H. Shaljian and Seth I. Davenport argued the cause for appellant (Shumann Hanlon, LLC, attorneys; Ronald H. Shaljian, of counsel; Seth I. Davenport and Joseph Elmo Cauda, Jr. , on the brief).

Gregory F. Kotchick , West Caldwell, argued the cause for respondent (Durkin & Durkin, LLC, attorneys; Gregory F. Kotchick, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges Fuentes, Accurso and Vernoia.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

In Piscitelli v. City of Garfield Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 237 N.J. 333, 205 A.3d 183 (2019), our Supreme Court recently addressed and clarified the standards governing disqualifying conflicts of interests for municipal planning and zoning board members and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases