CATALINA MARKETING v. HUDYMAN

DOCKET NO. A-3044-18T4 A-3651-18T4.

212 A.3d 997 (2019)

459 N.J.Super. 613

CATALINA MARKETING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Louis HUDYMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 25, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven C. Schechter , Fair Lawn, argued the cause for appellant.

David Lichtenberg , Murray Hill, argued the cause for respondent (Fisher Phillips LLP, attorneys; David Lichtenberg and William E. Corum (Husch Blackwell, LLP) of the Missouri bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel; David J. Treibman , Murray Hill, on the briefs).

Before Judges Messano, Fasciale and Gooden Brown.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

We granted defendant Louis Hudyman leave to appeal two orders of the Chancery Division that "dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction" his motions to quash subpoenas served on an out-of-state non-party, Quotient Technology, Inc. (Quotient), defendant's current employer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases