1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 206 A.3d
  5. 206 A.3d 979 (2019)
 

SUSKO v. BOROUGH OF BELMAR

DOCKET No. A-3059-16T2.

206 A.3d 979 (2019)

458 N.J. Super. 583

John E. SUSKO, Francine M. Dolan, Kyle Brown, Michael Seebeck, Patricia Corea, Noreen Dean, James Bean, and Joy DeSanctis, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. BOROUGH OF BELMAR and Mayor and Council of the Borough of Belmar, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 22, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William W. Northgrave , Newark, argued the cause for appellants (Mc Manimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC, attorneys; William W. Northgrave and Thaddeus J. Del Guercio, III , on the briefs).

Kenneth E. Pringle , Belmar, argued the cause for respondents (Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC attorneys; Kenneth E. Pringle , of counsel and on the brief; Denise M. O'Hara , on the brief).

Before Judges Alvarez, Nugent and Reisner.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

In response to the physical and economic devastation wrought by Superstorm Sandy, the Borough of Belmar took, or planned to take, a series of actions that were inconsistent with a thirty-year-old but still binding court decision in Slocum v. Borough of Belmar

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases