1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 200 A.3d
  5. 200 A.3d 419 (2019)
 

BOROUGH OF GLASSBORO v. GROSSMAN

DOCKET No. A-4556-17T2.

200 A.3d 419 (2019)

457 N.J.Super. 416

BOROUGH OF GLASSBORO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jack GROSSMAN, Matthew Roche, and Dan DeSilvio, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 7, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. William Potter argued the cause for appellants (Potter and Dickson, attorneys; R. William Potter and Peter Dickson , Princeton, on the briefs).

M. James Maley, Jr. , argued the cause for respondent (Maley Givens, PC, attorneys; M. James Maley, Jr., Erin E. Simone , and Kevin Diduch , Collingswood, on the brief).

Robert J. McNamara (Institute for Justice) of the Virginia bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for amicus curiae Institute for Justice (McKirdy, Riskin, Olson & DellaPelle, PC and Robert J. McNamara, attorneys; Anthony F. DellaPelle , Morristown, and Robert J. McNamara, on the brief).

Before Judges Sabatino, Haas and Sumners.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

In this accelerated appeal, we must consider the evidentiary implications of a key provision within the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law ("LRHL"), N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-1 to -49. The provision in question, N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-8(c), authorizes a municipality or redevelopment agency to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases