PIECH v. LAYENDECKER

DOCKET NO. A-1417-16T4.

194 A.3d 543 (2018)

456 N.J.Super. 367

Staci PIECH, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Glenn LAYENDECKER, Defendant-Respondent, and John Layendecker, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, and Ann Layendecker, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 19, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Gorman , argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent Staci Piech , (Lutz, Shafranski, Gorman and Mahoney PA, attorneys; John R. Gorman, New Brunswick, of counsel and on the brief).

David P. Skand , argued the cause for respondent Glenn Layendecker , (Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, attorneys; Robert P. Zoller , Lawrenceville, of counsel and on the brief; David P. Skand, Lawrenceville, on the brief).

John A. Camassa, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant John Layendecker, (Camassa Law Firm, PC, attorneys; John A. Camassa , Manasquan, of counsel; Christopher M. Brady , Pine Brook, on the brief).

Before Judges Fasciale, Gooden Brown and Rose.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

This personal injury social-guest liability case deals with flawed jury charges, the erroneous admission of subjective lay opinion testimony into evidence, the proper denial of summary judgment, and the inapplicability of the law of the case doctrine.

Plaintiff Staci Piech...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases