GOLDMAN v. CRITTER CONTROL OF NJ

Docket No. A-1392-16T2, A-3906-16T2.

185 A.3d 946 (2018)

454 N.J.Super. 418

Stuart GOLDMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRITTER CONTROL OF NEW JERSEY, Kewin, Inc., d/b/a Critter Control of New Jersey, Robert McDonough and Evan Windholz, Defendants-Respondents. Stuart Goldman, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Madison Carlstrom, Matthew Hill and Simplicity Farms, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 7, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert J. Rescinio argued the cause for appellant (Law Offices of Albert J. Rescinio, LLC, attorneys; Jeff Thakker , of counsel and on the brief; Albert J. Rescinio, on the brief).

Harry J. Levin argued the cause for respondents Critter Control of New Jersey, Kerwin, Inc. d/b/a Critter Control of New Jersey, Robert McDonough and Evan Windholz ( Levin Cyphers , attorneys; Harry J. Levin, on the brief).

Respondents Madison Carlstrom, Matthew Hill and Simplicity Farms, have not filed a brief.

Before Judges Fuentes, Manahan, and Suter.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

We consolidate these two appeals for the purpose of this opinion. In Goldman v. Critter Control of New Jersey, A-1392-16 (Critter Control), plaintiff Stuart Goldman appeals from the September 6, 2016 order that dismissed with prejudice the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases