BRECKE v. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC.

Nos. A-1359-14T4, A-1361-14T4, A-2581-14T4, A-2582-14T4.

KRISTY BRECKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC., ROCHE LABORATORIES INC., F. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE LTD., and ROCHE HOLDING LTD., Defendants-Respondents. GREGORY LUONGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC., ROCHE LABORATORIES INC., F. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE LTD., and ROCHE HOLDING LTD., Defendants-Respondents. JAMES ALBERT BOERMA, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC., ROCHE LABORATORIES INC., F. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE LTD., and ROCHE HOLDING LTD., Defendants-Respondents. BRIAN THOMAS ZIMPFER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC., ROCHE LABORATORIES INC., F. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE LTD., and ROCHE HOLDING LTD., Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 30, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Cash, III (Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty & Proctor, PA) of the Florida bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Bruce D. Greenberg , argued the cause for appellants (Lite, DePalma Greenberg, LLC, Seeger Weiss LLP, Sugarman Law, LLC and William F. Cash, III , attorneys; David R. Buchanan , Barry Sugarman , Michael D. Hook and Stephen F. Bolton (Hook & Bolton) of the Florida bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Mary Jane Bass (Beggs & Lane) of the Florida bar, admitted pro hac vice, on the brief).

Paul W. Schmidt (Covington & Burling LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondents (Gibbons PC, and Paul W. Schmidt , attorneys; Michelle M. Bufano , of counsel and on the brief; Michael X. Imbroscio (Covington & Burling LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Paul W. Schmidt, on the brief).

Before Judges Fisher, Sumners and Moynihan.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

In these consolidated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases