SLUTSKY v. SLUTSKY

Docket Nos. A-5829-13T1, A-2813-14T1.

167 A.3d 660 (2017)

451 N.J. Super. 332

Nancy G. SLUTSKY, Plaintiff-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Kenneth J. SLUTSKY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent. Nancy G. Slutsky, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kenneth J. Slutsky, Defendant-Appellant. Donahue, Hagan, Klein & Weisberg, LLC, Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 8, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward S. Snyder argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent in A-5829-13 and Scott D. Danaher argued the cause for appellant in A-2813-14 (Snyder, Sarno, D'Aniello, Maceri & DaCosta, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Snyder, of counsel and on the briefs; Mr. Danaher, on the briefs).

Ronald M. Abramson argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant in A-5829-13 (Winne, Banta, Basralian & Kahn, PC, attorneys; Mr. Abramson, of counsel and on the brief).

Donahue, Hagan, Klein & Weisberg, LLC, pro se respondent in A-2813-14 (Francis W. Donahue, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges Lihotz, Hoffman and Whipple.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

These two appeals arise from the parties' matrimonial litigation. The court scheduled the matters back-to-back before the same panel to address all issues in a single opinion.

In Docket No. A-5829-13, defendant Kenneth J. Slutsky appeals from a May 30, 2014 final judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases