1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 164 A.3d
  5. 164 A.3d 435 (2017)
 

DUTCH RUN-MAYS v. WOLF BLOCK

Docket No. A-0922-15T4.

164 A.3d 435 (2017)

450 N.J. Super. 590

DUTCH RUN-MAYS DRAFT, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOLF BLOCK, LLP, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 5, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan O'Boyle argued the cause for appellant (The O'Boyle Law Firm, P.C. and Law Offices of David Alan Klein, P.C., attorneys; David Alan Klein , on the brief).

Stephen M. Orlofsky argued the cause for respondent (Blank Rome LLP, attorneys; Mr. Orlofsky , of counsel; Adrienne C. Rogove , of counsel and on the brief; Ethan M. Simon , on the brief).

Before Judges Lihotz, Hoffman and Whipple.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

A fundamental question in every legal action is whether a given court has jurisdiction to preside over a given case. Absent personal jurisdiction over the parties, a judge has no authority to proceed. Plaintiff Dutch Run-Mays Draft, LLC, a West Virginia limited liability company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases