1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 152 A.3d
  5. 152 A.3d 948 (2016)
 

FDASMART v. DISHMAN PHARM.

Docket No. A-2800-15T3.

152 A.3d 948 (2016)

448 N.J. Super. 195

FDASMART, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DISHMAN PHARMACEUTICALS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED and Dishman USA, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 29, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kim M. Watterson (Reed Smith LLP) of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants (Reed Smith LLP, attorneys; Daniel Mateo and Amy McVeigh , on the briefs).

James D. Young argued the cause for respondent (Fox Rothschild LLP, attorneys; Mr. Young and Steven J. Daroci , on the brief).

Before Judges Nugent, Haas, and Currier.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

In this contract action, we must determine whether personal jurisdiction was properly found, thus permitting the suit against defendants to proceed in New Jersey. Because we find that New Jersey does not have either specific or general jurisdiction over defendant Dishman Pharmaceuticals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases