1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 116 A.3d
  5. 116 A.3d 1074 (2015)
 

STATE v. ROSS

Docket No. A-3026-13T4, A-5460-13T4

116 A.3d 1074 (2015)

441 N.J. Super. 120

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. Taladeen ROSS, Dwayne Johnson, Kenneth Robinson, Pedro Vickers, Paul Staten, Chad Butler, Jr., Jamil Anthony, Jaamir Hill, Sidney Williams, Tereak Butler, Sharna Ross, Maurice Fields, Jashire Reid, Zaire Franklin-Sherman, Nadrell McMillan, Quaadir Hagood, Jamar Hill, Desire Robinson, Devin Gardner, Darnell Ricketts, Dylan Freer, Shaniqua Doyle, April Thompson, Darrell Morrison and Taneja Oliver, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 10, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G. Kelso , Middlesex County Counsel, attorney for appellants The Middlesex County Adult Correction Center and County of Middlesex ( Benjamin D. Leibowitz , Senior Deputy County Counsel, on the briefs).

Joseph E. Krakora , Public Defender, attorney for respondent Public Defender ( Stefan Van Jura , Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the brief).

Yonta Law , attorneys for respondent Maurice Fields; Jack Venturi & Associates, attorneys for respondent Taladeen Ross; Abdelhadi & Associates, Paterson, attorneys for respondent Sharna Ross; Law Offices of William M. Fetky, attorneys for respondent Chad Butler; Anderl & Oakley, Princeton, attorneys for respondent Zaire Franklin-Sherman; Kenneth Goodman , attorney for respondent Paul Staten; Kelly Anderson Smith , attorney for respondent Quaadir Hagood; Rodger J. Wolf , attorney for respondent Jamar Hill; Michael A. Priarone , attorney for respondent Nadrell McMillan; David R. Meiswinkle , attorney for respondent Jamil Anthony; Michael R. Napolitano , attorney for respondent Jaamir Hill; and Raymond P. Morasse , attorney for respondent Pedro Vickers, join in the brief of respondent Public Defender.

Before Judges FISHER, ACCURSO and MANAHAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

During the pretrial stage of this criminal prosecution, the trial judge entered orders directing the County of Middlesex to provide the means by which incarcerated defendants could accept, access and examine electronic discovery. Although we share the County's misgivings about the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases