1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 113 A.3d
  5. 113 A.3d 1217 (2015)
 

PITNEY BOWES BANK v. ABC CAGING FULFILLMENT

DOCKET NO. A-2287-13T3

113 A.3d 1217 (2015)

440 N.J. Super. 378

The PITNEY BOWES BANK, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ABC CAGING FULFILLMENT, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 8, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeff Thakker argued the cause for appellant.

Nicola G. Suglia argued the cause for respondent (Fleischer, Fleischer & Suglia, attorneys; Jaclyn Scarduzio Dopke , Voorhees, on the brief).

Before Judges MESSANO, OSTRER and HAYDEN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

In this case we consider the effect of N.J.S.A. 34:11-31 and -32 on a levy, pursuant to a writ of execution, of a debtor's bank account, which purportedly was used to pay employees' wages. Defendant ABC Caging Fulfillment (ABC) appeals from

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases