1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 111 A.3d
  5. 111 A.3d 123 (2015)
 

JAMES v. RUIZ

111 A.3d 123 (2015)

440 N.J. Super. 45

William JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rosalind RUIZ, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 25, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Zaorski , Hammonton, argued the cause for appellant (Cappuccio & Zaorski, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Zaorski and Tammy M. Maxey , on the brief).

Chad M. Moore argued the cause for respondent (Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Moore, of counsel and on the brief; Juliann M. Alicino , New Brunswick, on the brief).

Before Judges SABATINO, GUADAGNO and LEONE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

We address in this appeal the propriety of questioning an expert witness at a civil trial, either on direct or cross-examination, about whether that testifying expert's findings are consistent with those of a non-testifying expert who issued a report in the course of an injured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases