1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 99 A.3d
  5. 99 A.3d 336 (2014)
 

HENEBEMA v. SOUTH JERSEY TRANSP.

A-7 September Term 2013, 072545

99 A.3d 336 (2014)

219 N.J. 481

Janet HENEBEMA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SOUTH JERSEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and New Jersey State Police, Defendants-Appellants, and Michael R. Testa, Maria E. Pereira, Domenico Raddi, Jr., Joshua Cooper, Rey S. Cooper, Trooper C. Deangelis, and Trooper M. Razukas, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided September 29, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen M. Orlofsky argued the cause for appellants ( Blank Rome , attorneys; Mr. Orlofsky , Adrienne C. Rogove , Princeton, and Jaret N. Gronczewski , on the briefs).

Christine Petruzzell , Woodbridge, argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys).

Judge RODRÍGUEZ (temporarily assigned) delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case, a jury determined that two New Jersey public entities. South Jersey Transportation Authority (Authority) and the New Jersey State Police (State Police), were liable for injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of a multi-vehicle pile-up on the Atlantic City Expressway (Expressway) during a heavy snowstorm.1 Plaintiff alleged that the public...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases