1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 98 A.3d
  5. 98 A.3d 1213 (2014)
 

R. NEUMANN v. CITY OF HOBOKEN

Docket No. A-2775-12T1

98 A.3d 1213 (2014)

437 N.J. Super. 384

R. NEUMANN & CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HOBOKEN, City Council of the City Of Hoboken, Dawn Zimmer, Mayor of the City of Hoboken, and Planning Board of the City of Hoboken, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 23, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter D. Dickson argued the cause for appellant (Potter and Dickson, attorneys; R. William Potter and Mr. Dickson, Princeton, on the brief).

Ronald D. Cucchiaro argued the cause for respondents (Weiner Lesniak, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Cucchiaro, of counsel and on the brief; Richard Brigliadoro , Parsippany, on the brief).

Before Judges GRALL, NUGENT and ACCURSO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

GRALL, P.J.A.D.

This appeal concerns Resolution No. 1 of the City Council of the City of Hoboken (Council) adopted pursuant to the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law (LRHL), N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-1 to -49. With that resolution, the Council delineated an "area in need of rehabilitation" (AINreh), which "means any area determined to be in need of rehabilitation pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-14]." This AINreh...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases