1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 89 A.3d
  5. 89 A.3d 1258 (2014)
 

IN RE STATE GRAND JURY

A-65 September Term 2012, 072552

89 A.3d 1258 (2014)

217 N.J. 430

In re STATE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 22, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Muroski , Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant State of New Jersey ( John J. Hoffman , Acting Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Muroski , Mark G. Eliades , and Christopher S. Romanyshyn , Trenton, of counsel and on the briefs).

Vikrant Pawar argued the cause for respondents John Weichsel, Esq. , Robert Blossner, Esq. , Tom Cataldo, Esq. , Murray Richman, Esq. , Stacey Richman, Esq. , and Paul Chiaramonte, Esq.

Henry E. Klingeman argued the cause for amicus curiae The Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey ( Krovatin Klingeman , attorneys; Mr. Klingeman , Florham Park, and Helen A. Nau , Newark, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

This unusual matter comes before the Court on leave granted to the State of New Jersey. In re State Grand Jury Investigation, 214 N.J. 112, 67 A.3d 1188 (2013). The appeal arises out of a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum that had been issued by the State Grand Jury to private criminal defense attorneys for fee records pertaining to "any defendant named within State Grand Jury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases