1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ROTHSTEIN v. WARSCHAWSKI
 

ROTHSTEIN v. WARSCHAWSKI

No. A-2356-12T2.

CHANA ROTHSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BENJAMIN WARSCHAWSKI, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 11, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neal M. Pomper argued the cause for appellant (Pomper & Associates, attorneys; Mr. Pomper, on the briefs).

Daniel N. Epstein argued the cause for respondent (Epstein Arlen, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Epstein, of counsel and on the brief; Carol Matula , on the brief).

Before Judges Alvarez and Ostrer.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves a post-judgment dispute over which religious private school the divorced parties' daughter should attend. Plaintiff appeals from part of a December 21, 2012, Family Part order compelling her to enroll the parties' child in a school accredited by a secular accreditation body. As the trial court did not adequately consider the child's educational, emotional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases