ESTATE OF KOTSOVSKA v. LIEBMAN

DOCKET NO. A-5512-11T4

81 A.3d 715 (2013)

433 N.J. Super. 537

ESTATE OF Myroslava KOTSOVSKA, by Olena KOTSOVSKA, Administrator, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Saul LIEBMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 26, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Cox argued the cause for appellant (McCreedy and Cox, attorneys; Mr. Cox, Cranford, on the briefs).

George E. Spaneas of the New Hampshire bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent (Smith, Stratton, Wise, Heher & Brennan, LLP, and Mr. Spaneas, attorneys; Gerald D. Wixted , Princeton, and Mr. Spaneas, of counsel and on the briefs).

Before Judges GRALL, SIMONELLI and ACCURSO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by ACCURSO, J.A.D.

Defendant Saul Liebman appeals from a $565,806.37 final judgment in this wrongful death action, following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Estate of Myroslava Kotsovska (the estate), and from the denial of his motion for a new trial. Liebman contends that decedent was his employee, and thus the Workers' Compensation Act's (the Act) exclusivity bar, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, prohibits her estate from maintaining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases