PATERSON POLICE PBA LOCAL 1 v. CITY OF PATERSON

DOCKET NO. A-1263-11T1

80 A.3d 1152 (2013)

433 N.J. Super. 416

PATERSON POLICE PBA LOCAL 1 and Paterson Police PBA Local 1 Superior Officers Association, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CITY OF PATERSON, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 27, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian W. Kronick argued the cause for appellant (Genova, Burns, Giantomasi & Webster, attorneys; Mr. Kronick, of counsel; David K. Broderick and Brett M. Pugach , Newark, on the briefs).

Mark C. Rushfield argued the cause for respondents (Shaw, Perelson, May & Lambert, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Rushfield, of counsel and on the brief).

Robert Fagella , Newark, argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey State Police Benevolent Association (Zazzali, Fagella, Nowak, Kleinbaum & Friedman, attorneys; Paul L. Kleinbaum , of counsel and on the brief; Marissa A. McAleer , Newark, on the brief).

Eileen Schlindwein Den Bleyker , Senior Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Division of Local Government Services and New Jersey Department of the Treasury, Division of Pensions and Benefits ( Jeffrey S. Chiesa , Attorney General, attorney; Robert Lougy , Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Ms. Den Bleyker, on the brief).

Matthew Weng , Staff Counsel, argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey State League of Municipalities ( William J. Kearns, Jr. , General Counsel, attorney; Mr. Weng, on the brief).

Craig S. Gumpel argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey State Firefighters' Mutual Benevolent Association (Fox & Fox, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Gumpel, Livingston, on the brief).

Before Judges GRAVES, ESPINOSA and GUADAGNO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

ESPINOSA, J.A.D.

After collective negotiation agreements (CNAs) between defendant City of Paterson and plaintiffs, Paterson Police PBA Local 1 and Paterson Police PBA Local 1 Superior Officers Association,1 expired, the parties engaged in compulsory interest arbitration. The resulting award required, in part, that police officers "shall make contributions toward health insurance coverage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases