1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 64 A.3d
  5. 64 A.3d 1012 (2013)
 

WINSTOCK v. GALASSO

Docket No. A-2715-10T2

64 A.3d 1012 (2013)

430 N.J. Super. 391

Jennifer WINSTOCK and Richard Winstock, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Amato GALASSO, Esq., Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 6, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gabriel H. Halpern , Morristown, argued the cause for appellants (Pinilis & Halpern, LLP, attorneys; Jeffrey S. Mandel , Manalapan, and Mr. Halpern , of counsel and on the briefs).

Robert B. Hille , Morristown, argued the cause for respondent (McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Hille , of counsel and on the brief; John W. Kaveney , Morristown, on the brief).

Before Judges FUENTES, GRAVES, and HARRIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, P.J.A.D.

In this legal malpractice case, the Law Division granted defendant attorney Amato Galasso's summary judgment motion, dismissing plaintiffs Jennifer and Richard Winstock's (wife and husband) complaint as a matter of law.

We frame the issues raised by plaintiffs in this appeal in the form of the following questions: (1) can Richard Winstock, a former Roxbury police officer, sue defendant for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases