1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 63 A.3d
  5. 63 A.3d 230 (2013)
 

HITESMAN v. BRIDGEWAY INC.

Docket No. A-0140-11T3

63 A.3d 230 (2013)

430 N.J. Super. 198

James HITESMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. BRIDGEWAY INC., d/b/a Bridgeway Care Center, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 22, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Castronovo argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Castronovo & McKinney, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Castronovo , of counsel and on the briefs; Megan Frese Porio , Morristown, on the brief).

Craig S. Provorny , Warren, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Herold Law, P.A., attorneys; Mr. Provorny , on the briefs).

Before Judges GRAVES, ESPINOSA and GUADAGNO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ESPINOSA, J.A.D.

A licensed or certified health care professional may assert a claim against his or her employer pursuant to the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -8, based upon a reasonable belief that the employer's conduct "constitutes improper quality of patient care[.]" N.J.S.A. 34:19-3a(1) and c(1). The statutory definition of "improper quality of patient care" includes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases