1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 47 A.3d
  5. 47 A.3d 48 (2012)
 

PAULSBORO v. ESSEX CHEMICAL

Docket No. A-5248-10T4.

47 A.3d 48 (2012)

427 N.J. Super. 123

BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESSEX CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 16, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. James Maley, Jr. , argued the cause for appellant (Maley & Associates, attorneys; Mr. Maley , Erin E. Simone and Emily K. Givens , on the briefs).

Kenneth H. Mack argued the cause for respondent ( Fox Rothschild , attorneys; Mr. Mack , of counsel and on the brief; Barry J. Muller , Lawrenceville, on the brief).

Before Judges GRALL, ALVAREZ and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SKILLMAN, J.A.D. (retired and temporarily assigned on recall).

In Housing Authority of the City of New Brunswick v. Suydam Investors, L.L.C., 177 N.J. 2, 23-24, 826 A.2d 673 (2003), the Court held that contaminated property acquired in an eminent domain action must be valued as if the contamination had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases