1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 46 A.3d
  5. 46 A.3d 586 (2012)
 

PITCOCK v. KASOWITZ, BENSON

Docket No. A-5036-10T2

46 A.3d 586 (2012)

426 N.J. Super. 582

Jeremy S. PITCOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN, L.L.P., Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 25, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geisa Balla ( Balestriere Fariello ) and John G. Balestriere ( Balestriere Fariello ) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for appellant (Mr. Balestriere , on the brief).

Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, L.L.P., respondent pro se ( Brian S. Kaplan , on the brief).

Before Judges PARRILLO, ALVAREZ and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SKILLMAN, J.A.D. (retired and temporarily assigned on recall).

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the applicable New Jersey or New York statute of limitations governs an action for malicious use of process based on a lawsuit filed in New York that arose out of a dispute centered in New York. We conclude that under the "most significant relationship" test that now controls the resolution of choice-of-law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases