1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 45 A.3d
  5. 45 A.3d 1001 (2012)
 

J.E.V. v. K.V.

A-2933-09T2

45 A.3d 1001 (2012)

426 N.J. Super. 475

J.E.V., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. K.V., Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 21, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Hartmann, III , Princeton, argued the cause for appellant (Pellettieri, Rabstein & Altman, attorneys; Mr. Hartmann , of counsel; Nicole J. Huckerby , Trenton, on the brief).

Barbara Ulrichsen argued the cause for respondent (Ulrichsen, Rosen & Freed LLC, attorneys; Ms. Ulrichsen, of counsel and on the brief; Rebecca C. Day, Pennington, on the brief).

Before Judges CUFF, LIHOTZ and WAUGH.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CUFF, P.J.A.D.

In this appeal, the dependent spouse argues that the trial judge erred by awarding limited duration alimony rather than permanent alimony. We reaffirm established principles governing the award of limited duration alimony, which consider the length of the marriage, the period of economic dependency during the marriage, and the skills and education necessary to return to the workforce rather than an overriding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases