1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 42 A.3d
  5. 42 A.3d 227 (2012)
 

SAURO v. SAURO

Docket No. A-2735-09T3

42 A.3d 227 (2012)

425 N.J. Super. 555

Edie Britman SAURO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Frank SAURO, Defendant-Respondent. In the Matter of Budd Larner, P.C., Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 14, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas D. Baldwin , Short Hills, argued the cause for pro se appellant.

Edie Britman Sauro , respondent, argued the cause pro se.

Frank Sauro , respondent, argued the cause pro se.

Before Judges FUENTES, ASHRAFI and NUGENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

The law firm of Budd Larner, P.C. (Budd Larner) was one of three firms that represented plaintiff Edie Britman Sauro during this protracted matrimonial case. Budd Larner now appeals the Family Part's equitable distribution award, arguing that the manner in which the court allocated the parties' marital assets negatively affected the firm's attorney charging lien pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:13-5....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases