1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 44 A.3d
  5. 44 A.3d 601 (2012)
 

STONEY v. MAPLE SHADE TP.

Docket No. A-1777-10T3.

44 A.3d 601 (2012)

426 N.J. Super. 297

Carmena STONEY, Plaintiff, and Linda Vandeusen, Plaintiff-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. MAPLE SHADE TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 11, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric L. Harrison , Edison, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Methfessel & Werbel, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Harrison , of counsel and on the brief).

Anthony J. Brady, Jr. , argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant.

Before Judges PARRILLO, SKILLMAN and HOFFMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PARRILLO, P.J.A.D.

At issue is whether a trial court may deny injunctive relief upon a jury finding of access discrimination under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213, and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49.

By way of background, plaintiff Linda Vandeusen, a South Carolina resident, has dystonia, is wheelchair...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases