1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 42 A.3d
  5. 42 A.3d 892 (2012)
 

SCHMIDT v. CELGENE CORP.

Docket No. A-2685-10T2

42 A.3d 892 (2012)

425 N.J. Super. 600

David SCHMIDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CELGENE CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent, and CVS/Caremark Corporation, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 9, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil Mullin , argued the cause for appellant ( Smith Mullin , P.C., attorneys; Mr. Mullin, of counsel and on the brief; James E. Burden , on the brief).

James P. Flynn argued the cause for respondent (Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., attorneys; Carmine A. Iannaccone , of counsel and on the brief; Daniel R. Levy , Newark, on the brief).

Before Judges PARRILLO, GRALL and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

GRALL, J.A.D.

Plaintiff David Schmidt appeals from the dismissal of a complaint charging his employer, Celgene Corporation, and one of Celgene's customers, CVS/Caremark Corporation (Caremark), with violations of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -14. Schmidt filed the complaint well beyond CEPA's one-year limitation period, N.J.S.A. 34:19-5, while he had a breach of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases