1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 37 A.3d
  5. 37 A.3d 1155 (2012)
 

GROW CO., INC. v. CHOKSHI

Docket No. A-0026-10T4

37 A.3d 1155 (2012)

424 N.J. Super. 357

GROW COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Dilip CHOKSHI and Pharmachem Laboratories, Inc., Defendants-Respondents/Cross-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 7, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis F. Gleason , Roseland, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody & Agnello, attorneys; Carl R. Woodward, III , and Mr. Gleason, of counsel; Mr. Woodward, Mr. Gleason and Vincenzo M. Mogavero , on the brief).

Richard L. Ravin , Paramus, argued the cause for respondents/cross-appellants (Hartman & Winnicki, attorneys; Mr. Ravin, of counsel; Mr. Ravin, Richard E. Kummer and Shifra Herzberg , on the brief).

Before Judges CARCHMAN, FISHER and BAXTER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FISHER, J.A.D.

In this appeal, we review the Chancery judge's disposition of numerous factual disputes following a nonjury trial, as well as the judge's subsequent ruling on defendants' counsel fee claim. Applying our deferential standard of review, we find no reason to intervene and affirm in all respects.

Because this case was previously before us, there is no need to repeat what was thoroughly discussed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases