ROWE v. MAZEL THIRTY, LLC

A-95 September Term 2010, 067237

34 A.3d 1248 (2012)

209 N.J. 35

Willie C. ROWE and Karen Rowe, his Spouse, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MAZEL THIRTY, LLC and 40-50 Lenox Realty Associates, LLC, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 2, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pablo N. Blanco , South Orange, argued the cause for appellants (The Blanco Law Firm, attorneys).

Richard J. Hull , Livingston, argued the cause for respondents ( Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn , attorneys).


Justice LONG delivered the opinion of the Court.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether summary judgment properly was granted to a landowner on whose private premises a police officer, engaged in a safe-streets initiative, fell and was injured. In such circumstances, the police officer stood in the shoes of a licensee to whom the landowner owed a duty to warn of any dangerous conditions of which the owner knew or had reason to know and of which the officer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases