1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 32 A.3d
  5. 32 A.3d 1117 (2011)
 

IN RE HYDERALLY

D-134 September Term 2010 068701.

32 A.3d 1117 (2011)

208 N.J. 453

In the Matter of Ty HYDERALLY, an Attorney at Law.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 20, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walton W. Kingsbery, III , Assistant Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Frederick J. Dennehy , Woodbridge, argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This ethics proceeding requires the Court to determine whether respondent, Ty Hyderally, violated Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 8.4(c), which prohibits "conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation," by virtue of his display of the seal of the New Jersey Board on Attorney Certification on his law firm website, notwithstanding the fact that respondent is not a Certified Attorney.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases